70,000 miles - battery degradation check | BMW i4 Forum
BMW i4 Forum banner

70,000 miles - battery degradation check

35 reading
624 views 9 replies 7 participants last post by  BadgerGreg  
#1 ·
At 70,000 miles and 3 years + 4 months of ownership, my battery seems to be in pretty solid shape, or at least what I would expect at this point. My previous posts have included scatterplots with trend lines, but I've found them to be less useful than direct measurements I get from full charges and from an OBDII scanner (+EVScanner app).

I fully charged my car (from 0% to 100%) last night. The charging session used 84 kWh. Adjusting for losses (typically between 9%-10%* when charging from empty to full), the energy delivered was 76 kWh, which puts me at 6.5% degradation (assuming an original capacity of 81.3 kWh).

* typical Level 2 losses are 5%-5.5%, but there is a lot of charging 'overhead' to bring the cells to 100%, so losses jump up to nearly 10% when deep charging from near zero to full.

This is pretty consistent with my EVScanner data (see image), which shows my readings straddling the fleet average curve of battery health. 93% (7% degradation) is expected at this mileage, and that seems to be where I'm at. I also use Recurrent (Recurrent » Driving EV Trust and Value with Real-world Data) to track my car data and battery health, and that shows a score of 92 (which implies 92% state of health), although I'm not exactly sure how it arrives at that value. In any case, these three measurements (full charge analysis, EVScanner, and Recurrent) all give a pretty consistent and confident answer regarding degradation.

Other key statistics from EVScanner (useful for some of you who geek out about the data):
  • Total charges: 1,134
  • Full charges: 39 (3% of all charges)
  • Full charge cycles: 289

Image


Image
 
#7 ·
I'm at 39k miles on my '23 m50, and today I charged to 100% for a long trip and it estimated 266 mile range. I ended up driving 200 miles exactly (which is less than I had originally planned or I wouldn't have fully charged) and have an estimated 68 miles left (27%) - 3.6 mi/kwh and 52 mph average speed. I'm quite happy with that, and it's certainly in the range of what I have gotten all along. It's not scientific in any way, but I could be complaining of much worse range, etc! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pipestem
#8 ·
At some point we'll stop worrying about range so much. Few people worry about ICE cars with small fuel tanks - it just means more frequent stops at the pump. So long as there are enough refuelling stations, it's a slight inconvenience but no more. Having spent two weeks recently in Norway where there are HPC charging stations pretty much everywhere, I stopped worrying about charging and just filled up when I needed, confident that there would be a charger somewhere near.